Iusora
MethodologySubprocessors
Sign in
Open methodology · anti–black-box wedge

How Iusora scores.

Every finding is independently retrieved by five language models. Where multiple readers corroborate the same passage, the result enters the report with a high quorum coefficient. Where they disagree, we surface the disagreement — we never silently break ties.

Quorum routing

Five independent readers — Claude, Gemini, Mistral, Poolside, and GPT-4o — run in parallel on each claim element. A finding is confirmed when multiple vendors cite the same prior-art paragraph; single-vendor findings are surfaced and explicitly labeled in the report export, never silently resolved.

Thresholds are tenant-configurable. Forensic mode adds source URLs, paragraph citations, and per-vendor attribution in every DOCX export.

Citations & auditability

Each cited reference includes its exact paragraph or column-line citation, exportable to Word with hyperlinks intact. We benchmark retrieval against the EPO Boards of Appeal corpus quarterly; benchmark commits are timestamped in the public repo.

Transparency commitments

  • Routing logic and evaluation harnesses are published — no proprietary black box scoring.
  • Subprocessors are listed by name with EU residency status on /subprocessors and updated within five business days of any change.
  • We do not hide which model wrote which passage when forensic mode is enabled.
Last updated · Methodology v2.4 · May 2026Try the playground →